<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;There is probably no Semantic Web &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kantenwerk.org/2009/03/16/there-is-probably-no-semantic-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kantenwerk.org/2009/03/16/there-is-probably-no-semantic-web/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:58:01 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-beta1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kingsley Idehen</title>
		<link>http://kantenwerk.org/2009/03/16/there-is-probably-no-semantic-web/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Kingsley Idehen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kantenwerk.org/2009/03/16/there-is-probably-no-semantic-web/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Nice touch etc.

But do note that LOD and the Data Definition oriented relams of OWL, Inference, Entailment etc. aren&#039;t mutually exclusive. Of course we are taking one step at a time i.e., getting Linked Data comprehension and data spaces (ABox) out there, but be rest assured all of this if for nowt if we attempt to disrgard the TBox (what OWL deals with very well). 

Yes, there is probably no &quot;Semantic Web&quot; since the it was the moniker that emerged for the &quot;Semantic Web Project&quot; :-)

Slogan tweak:
There&#039;s probably no Semantic Web.
Now stop Searching &amp; Start Finding. 

:-)

Kingsley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice touch etc.</p>
<p>But do note that LOD and the Data Definition oriented relams of OWL, Inference, Entailment etc. aren&#8217;t mutually exclusive. Of course we are taking one step at a time i.e., getting Linked Data comprehension and data spaces (ABox) out there, but be rest assured all of this if for nowt if we attempt to disrgard the TBox (what OWL deals with very well). </p>
<p>Yes, there is probably no &#8220;Semantic Web&#8221; since the it was the moniker that emerged for the &#8220;Semantic Web Project&#8221; :-)</p>
<p>Slogan tweak:<br />
There&#8217;s probably no Semantic Web.<br />
Now stop Searching &amp; Start Finding. </p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>Kingsley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergio Fernández</title>
		<link>http://kantenwerk.org/2009/03/16/there-is-probably-no-semantic-web/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergio Fernández</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kantenwerk.org/2009/03/16/there-is-probably-no-semantic-web/#comment-166</guid>
		<description>:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
